Two of my favourite analysts are writing about a new Buzzfeed survey which suggests that most Americans believe the fake news they read on Facebook.
Craig Silverman describes
This shouldn’t be much of a surprise to anyone who’s been following the mushrooming, cancerous growth of fake content, or the undercurrent of crazy bubbling up through, ahem, “alternative channels.” The only observation I’d make here is how it underlines the importance of critical thinking; being able to distinguish facts from bullshit should be a basic civic skill, not a mark of “elitism.”
There’s more, though: Mathew Ingram cites an essay by Marcy Wheeler which raises questions about the extent to which people even remember what they read on Facebook at all. There’s some discussion of whether people recall real news better than fake news, but it’s not all that clear whether or to what extent they act on what they read. As Ingram argues:
Call me a dreadful skeptic if you like, but I’m not sure there’s much comfort in that. It’s not clear how many people remember what they read on Faceborg, but how much evidence do we need that what they see steers them toward stuff they do remember? Especially given the nature of confirmation bias and self-reinforcing bubbles? Not to mention Faceborg’s status as one of the world’s most overwhelmingly dominant distributors of content?
It only takes one guy with a gun and a head full of whacked-out conspiracy theory to walk into a pizza restaurant. Is it really impossible that he might have been steered that way by what he saw on FB?